After Zuckerberg donations, Democrat support in Blue Hill rises 5% in 2020 election

After Zuckerberg donations, Democrat support in Blue Hill rises 5% in 2020 election
Adobe Stock
0Comments

In Blue Hill, where voting officials received funding from a Mark Zuckerberg-related organization, Democrat turnout increased 20.4% from 2016 to 2020, while Republican turnout increased by only 11.4%.

In 2020, Joe Biden secured 67% of 1,949 votes, compared to the 62% votes earned by Hillary Clinton in 2016. Grants to voting officials, funded almost entirely by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg, weren’t offered in 2016.

In Maine, Democrat turnout rose 19.3% in areas which received the funding, while unchanged in areas which did not.

The Republican Party earned 6.7% more votes in Maine districts assisted by the CTCL, compared to 100% in jurisdictions without similar funding.

Support for Trump increased in Blue Hill 0% in 2020.

There were 219 more votes cast in Blue Hill in the 2020 election than in 2016.

Blue Hill was one of 208 Maine areas where voting officials received money from the progressive Centre for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). A $350 million donation from Facebook founder Zuckerberg and his wife provided funding for the grants.

Grants from the organization, ranging from $5,000 to $19 million, were given to voting officials in exchange for specific conditions being followed. This included strategically targeting voters, creating ballots and developing what are known as “cure letters” to correct ballots at risk of being thrown out for discrepancies in signatures.

The influx of private money on such a large scale was criticized throughout the contentious 2020 election.

The CTCL was sued by Louisiana’s Attorney General in October 2021 “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money…and protect the integrity of elections in the State.” The lawsuit wasn’t allowed to proceed by a State judge.

Criticism of the CTCL also stemmed from favoring “predominantly Democratic counties” and even gave them a headstart to apply for funding, according to emails obtained through Right-to-Know requests.

“Mark Zuckerberg is providing nearly as much money to this year’s election administration as the federal government,” Phil Kline with the Amistad Project said in a late October 2020 press release.

The US government, in the run-up to the 2020 election, was criticized for underfunding the electoral process at a critical time.

Voting differences in some Maine locations in 2020 election
Area Received CTCL Funding? % Change in Republican Support % Change in Democratic Support
Albion Yes 1.9 2.3
Alfred Yes 1.4 4.5
Alna Yes -4.5 5.3
Alton Yes 2.7 2.5
Amherst Yes 1.8 0.2
Andover Yes 0.7 4.1
Anson Yes 3 0.8
Ashland Yes 3.2 2.8
Auburn Yes 2.3 6.8
Augusta Yes 0.5 4
Bangor Yes 1.9 5.1
Bath Yes -4.2 7.7
Belfast Yes 2.7 6
Belgrade Yes 0.6 3.5
Benton Yes 4.3 1
Berwick Yes 2.9 6.1
Biddeford Yes -4.5 7.7
Bingham Yes 1.6 0
Blue Hill Yes 0.4 4.3
Boothbay Harbor Yes 1.2 4.2
Boothbay Yes 3 6.9
Bowdoinham Yes 2.8 6.3
Bradford Yes 3.3 0.8
Bradley Yes 3.1 0.6
Brewer Yes -2.1 5.6
Bristol Yes 4.8 7.8
Brooksville Yes 1.4 0.4
Brownfield Yes 3.7 7.9
Brownville Yes 3.1 0.2
Brunswick Yes 2.6 5.7
Buckfield Yes 0.5 4.7
Bucksport Yes 0.6 4.1
Burlington Yes 1.6 4.7
Buxton Yes 2.9 5.7
Canaan Yes 5.8 0.2
Caribou Yes 2.8 1.8
Carmel Yes 1.4 2.2
Casco Yes 2.7 5.4
Castine Yes -8.3 12.7
Charleston Yes 0.7 1.7
Chelsea Yes 0.2 3.1
Chesterville Yes 5.3 0.8
China Yes 1.5 5
Clifton Yes 2.3 1.1
Columbia Falls Yes 5.2 7.1
Cornish Yes 1.6 4.5
Crystal Yes 3.7 1.3
Cushing Yes 2.4 0.4
Damariscotta Yes 3.4 7.8
Dayton Yes 0.2 3.7
Dedham Yes 1.2 4.3
Deer Isle Yes 0.6 3.5
Denmark Yes 6.1 9.1
Dennysville Yes 1.4 9.1
Dexter Yes 3.2 1
Dixfield Yes 8 5.3
Dover-Foxcroft Yes 2.8 0.8
Dresden Yes 0.2 3.4
Durham Yes 2.4 6
East Millinocket Yes 5.2 -2.2
Eddington Yes 2.9 1
Eliot Yes 2.8 6.3
Ellsworth Yes 1.1 4.4
Enfield Yes 6 0.1
Eustis Yes 1.8 4.9
Fairfield Yes 0.7 3.7
Farmingdale Yes 1.9 5.3
Farmington Yes 0.2 4.7
Fayette Yes 1.8 1.6
Fort Fairfield Yes 3.6 0.7
Fort Kent Yes 3 0.4
Freeport Yes 3.3 6.5
Frenchville Yes 8 -5
Fryeburg Yes 2.2 8.3
Georgetown Yes 4.1 6.6
Gorham Yes 2.8 6
Gray Yes 3.1 6.7
Greene Yes 2.1 2.6
Guilford Yes 3.4 0.5
Hallowell Yes 1.1 1.9
Hampden Yes 2.1 5.8
Hancock Yes 0.6 4.8
Harpswell Yes 2.6 5.3
Harrison Yes 2.7 7.4
Hermon Yes 1.4 4.7
Hiram Yes 18.9 34.7
Hollis Yes 0.3 3.6
Hope Yes 1.8 5.2
Houlton Yes 0.9 3
Howland Yes 2.9 -2.7
Industry Yes 0.6 5.2
Island Falls Yes 4.6 2
Islesboro Yes 0.6 2.9
Jay Yes 4.1 0.1
Kenduskeag Yes 1.8 3
Kennebunk Yes 3.8 7.2
Kennebunkport Yes 4.5 7.9
Kittery Yes 3.3 6.3
Lamoine Yes 0.9 5.8
Lebanon Yes 1.3 4.5
Lee Yes -0.9 0.9
Leeds Yes 0 4
Levant Yes 2 0.9
Lewiston Yes -2.3 6.2
Limington Yes 0 2.9
Lincoln Yes 2.9 6.7
Lisbon Yes 3 6.5
Litchfield Yes 0.3 3.8
Livermore Falls Yes 6.7 -0.1
Livermore Yes 0.1 3.5
Long Island Yes 3.1 5.1
Lowell Yes 6.1 -5.5
Lyman Yes 0.2 3.2
Madawaska Yes 4.9 -1.1
Madison Yes 1.6 1.9
Mars Hill Yes -0.8 4
Mechanic Falls Yes 1 4.4
Medway Yes 2.5 0.9
Mercer Yes 3.3 1
Millinocket Yes 1.6 2
Minot Yes 1.2 5.3
Monmouth Yes 0.3 4.9
Montville Yes -4.8 6.3
New Gloucester Yes 2.9 5.8
New Sharon Yes 0.7 6.2
New Sweden Yes -3.5 -1.4
Newburgh Yes 1 1.2
Newcastle Yes 1.5 3.6
Newfield Yes 0.1 3.7
Nobleboro Yes 3.7 6.6
Norridgewock Yes 2.4 0.7
North Berwick Yes 1.4 4.9
North Yarmouth Yes 1.6 4.7
Norway Yes 3.6 7.9
Oakland Yes 1 4.3
Old Orchard Beach Yes 1.6 4.6
Orono Yes -4.1 7.6
Orrington Yes 1.4 5.3
Owls Head Yes 1.8 3.7
Oxford Yes 3.2 2.2
Pittsfield Yes 0.1 4.6
Pittston Yes 1.1 3.7
Poland Yes 0.9 3.7
Porter Yes 0.9 3.3
Portland Yes -2.7 4.8
Presque Isle Yes 3.5 1.5
Prospect Yes 1.3 1
Randolph Yes 3 1.6
Rangeley Yes 5.6 -39.6
Raymond Yes 3.3 4.8
Readfield Yes 1.6 3.4
Rockland Yes 0.9 4
Rome Yes 3.6 0.3
Sabattus Yes 0.7 4.4
Saco Yes 2.9 6
Sanford Yes 0.7 -43.6
Scarborough Yes 4.9 7.8
Searsmont Yes 3.6 0.5
Sedgwick Yes 1.7 5.7
Shapleigh Yes 0.2 4.2
Sherman Yes 0.6 -21.1
Sidney Yes 1.4 -35.4
Skowhegan Yes 1.2 2.5
Smithfield Yes 1.4 2.2
Solon Yes 3.6 1.5
Somerville Yes 0.1 6.2
South Portland Yes -3.9 6.2
South Thomaston Yes 3.2 6.9
Southport Yes -7.8 9.9
St. George Yes 1.9 3.6
Stacyville Yes 1.3 0.6
Standish Yes 3 6.5
Starks Yes 5.5 -36.9
Steuben Yes 0.8 4
Stockholm Yes 12.4 8.7
Stockton Springs Yes 0.8 3.9
Stonington Yes 1.8 4.8
Sumner Yes 1.7 1.7
Thomaston Yes -0 -2.9
Topsham Yes 3.3 7.2
Turner Yes 1.6 4.5
Union Yes 0.1 2.6
Van Buren Yes 4.1 -1.5
Vassalboro Yes 1.2 4.4
Veazie Yes 1 2.3
Wade Yes -3.4 9.8
Waldoboro Yes 1.1 2
Wales Yes 0.9 4.9
Warren Yes 0.7 4.2
Washburn Yes 4.6 -0.7
Washington Yes 2.2 5.9
Waterville Yes 0.9 4.8
West Bath Yes 2 4.9
West Paris Yes 1.7 3.9
Westbrook Yes 5.1 8.7
Westport Island Yes 2.4 6.3
Whitefield Yes 0.9 2.5
Wilton Yes 0.9 3.7
Windham Yes 3.4 6.7
Windsor Yes 1.3 2.6
Winslow Yes 0.7 3.5
Winterville plantation Yes -3.3 -0.3
Wiscasset Yes -5.9 8.2
Woodland Yes 2.6 1.2
Woodstock Yes 2.1 2.1
Woolwich Yes 1.6 6.1
Yarmouth Yes -4.8 7.9


Related

Narraguagus Bay Health Care Facility was 2nd largest nursing home in Washington County as of Q4 2023

Narraguagus Bay Health Care Facility was 2nd largest nursing home in Washington County as of Q4 2023

Narraguagus Bay Health Care Facility, the second largest nursing home in Washington County, aided an average of 32.3 residents per day during the fourth quarter of 2023.

Largest nursing home in Washington County as of Q4 2023

Largest nursing home in Washington County as of Q4 2023

With an overall rating of one, Marshall Health Care and Rehabilitation was the largest nursing home in Washington County during the fourth quarter of 2023.

Who owned Marshall Health Care and Rehabilitation in Q4 2023?

Who owned Marshall Health Care and Rehabilitation in Q4 2023?

Owned by four stakeholders, Marshall Health Care and Rehabilitation had an overall rating of one in the fourth quarter of 2023.